<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>foolography &#187; webservice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foolography.com/category/webservice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foolography.com</link>
	<description>GPS / Geotagging + Barcodes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:53:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>100,000,000 geotagged photos on flickr</title>
		<link>http://www.foolography.com/2009/02/06/100000000-geotagged-photos-on-flickr/</link>
		<comments>http://www.foolography.com/2009/02/06/100000000-geotagged-photos-on-flickr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 14:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Perialis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[flickr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webservice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geotagged]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geotagging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foolography.com/?p=389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[flickr announces that they passed 100,000,000 geotagged photos. So more than 3% of all flickr photos are geotagged. Most of these were probably tagged manually, a lot of work that is easily avoidable. 

What was that I was saying about a boom in geotagging this year?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com" target="_blank">flickr</a> announces that they passed 100,000,000 geotagged photos. So more than 3% of all flickr photos are geotagged. Most of these were probably tagged manually, a lot of work that is easily avoidable. </p>

<p>What was that I was saying about a boom in geotagging this year?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.foolography.com/2009/02/06/100000000-geotagged-photos-on-flickr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

